Smallest Decimal to Binary encoder

Holy shit neutrinos! Discuss.

Smallest Decimal to Binary encoder

Postby KoolKrafter » Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:49 am

I made a 8x14x7 decimal to binary encoder with an input panel. what's the smallest decimal to binary encoder anyone has ever made ?


Image
KoolKrafter
Carpenter
Carpenter
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:34 am

Re: Smallest Decimal to Binary encoder

Postby Gavjenks » Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:34 am

Not bad, but you still have a ton of airspace in there. I very very highly doubt that that is the smallest. Just from eyeballing it and a general intuition about how much you can compress redstone, I'm guessing it could be at least twice as small maybe significantly more than that.

As one simple example, redstone does not need to be spaced out every 2 blocks in lines. If you alternate repeaters and dust in a checkerboard, you can have lines of redstone right next to each other. Probably better ways to do it by now, too.
Gavjenks
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 914
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:32 pm

Re: Smallest Decimal to Binary encoder

Postby KoolKrafter » Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:39 am

Really? It's quite hard to make it any smaller because of the Redstone signals interfering but I'll give it a go. If I made some kind of calculator and a fancy input system on this, would it get my Whitelist do you think?

the only problem with using alternate Redstone and repeaters is the delay...
I've kept it on 3 for each one so far.
Image
KoolKrafter
Carpenter
Carpenter
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:34 am

Re: Smallest Decimal to Binary encoder

Postby Shakey_aj » Sun Jul 01, 2012 2:24 pm

If you are going to claim 'smallest' you go for smallest. Not 'reasonably small while avoiding some delay'.
Don't worry about today because it is already tomorrow in Australia.
Image
User avatar
Shakey_aj
Designer
Designer
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:00 am
Location: Great Britain

Re: Smallest Decimal to Binary encoder

Postby Xray_Doc » Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:19 pm

Ususally if you are trying to make something small it won't be fast the first few times you try making it but you can probably make it faster. But it probably still won't be as fast as one that has more space. But nice job making this so compact!
The answer is ALWAYS 26!
Image
User avatar
Xray_Doc
Carpenter
Carpenter
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 12:19 am
Location: Florida

Re: Smallest Decimal to Binary encoder

Postby KoolKrafter » Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:28 pm

Thanks for the feedback - I'll make another version with some delay and I'll make it even smaller.
Image
KoolKrafter
Carpenter
Carpenter
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:34 am

Re: Smallest Decimal to Binary encoder

Postby thedeadlybutter » Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:27 pm

KoolKrafter wrote:Really? It's quite hard to make it any smaller because of the Redstone signals interfering but I'll give it a go. If I made some kind of calculator and a fancy input system on this, would it get my Whitelist do you think?

the only problem with using alternate Redstone and repeaters is the delay...
I've kept it on 3 for each one so far.


no, a decimal decoder alone isn't WL.
Redstone Engineer - Plugineer - Curator - A Butter
Image
thedeadlybutter
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 1619
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 4:02 pm
Location: New York

Re: Smallest Decimal to Binary encoder

Postby KoolKrafter » Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:39 pm

thedeadlybutter wrote:
KoolKrafter wrote:Really? It's quite hard to make it any smaller because of the Redstone signals interfering but I'll give it a go. If I made some kind of calculator and a fancy input system on this, would it get my Whitelist do you think?

the only problem with using alternate Redstone and repeaters is the delay...
I've kept it on 3 for each one so far.


no, a decimal decoder alone isn't WL.

No, I mean with a calculator and memory or something.
Image
KoolKrafter
Carpenter
Carpenter
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:34 am


Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BlockCat and 2 guests